Archive for the ‘Politics’ Category

Australia Decides … but not on a Government

Politics | Posted by Dean
Aug 22 2010

On the 21st August Australia went to the polls with the aim of deciding on a new federal government. What has happened though is that Australians have lodged a national protest vote. Swings away from the ALP (Labor) has seen a spectacular fall in their numbers, however the traditional LNP (Liberal/National Party) have failed to capture enough vote to win a decisive majority.

The ALP has had a terrible time in government. They did do well during the global financial crisis in managing Australia through that difficult time without condemning Australia to recession. However, many of the programs that they credit for that success have been woefully mismanaged. The public were already revolting before Julia Gillard plunged the dagger into Kevin Rudds back, and they have never recovered.

Over the election campaign the ALP has focussed on policies that are not a massive leap from those of their traditional LNP rivals due to their march to the right. In the last few days the ALP decided to try and revive Work Choices fears. Fear mongering around Work Choices was a success in 2007, and Tony Abbott was a major proponent of the unpopular policy. ALP desperately hoped that reviving those fears was possible despite Mr Abbott repeatedly saying that it was dead. The people of Australia were not brainwashed into voting ALP.

They also were not convinced by the LNP either. The LNP failed to capture enough votes to claim a decisive victory. What they have though accomplished is amazing for a party that was smashed at the previous election. The LNP are likely to be proud to have the first indigenous representative and the youngest ever representative, and have increased their proportional representation. Have they won the right to form government though, the answer is clearly no.

Why has this happened? The reason is that neither the ALP or LNP have released radically different policies. Further, neither side has a real nation building package in play with perhaps the exception of the ALP version of the National Broadband Network (NBN). As such neither major party captured the minds of the voting public, in essence a fail all around.

The LNP and ALP now face the prospect of negotiating with the 4 x Independents and 1 x Green to form government. Depending on those negotiation will determine whether Tony Abbott or Julia Gillard will become Prime Minister. Neither though has a clear mandate. As such there is a chance that the NBN as planned by the ALP may will be retained in the form proposed if the LNP form government, personally I hope so. Similarly if the ALP form government the internet filter may need to be ditched, again I personally hope so.

Where did the voters turn to? The Green vote is up 3.8% nationally and hovers around 12%, however due to the preferential voting system in Australia they are only likely to attain any more than 1 seat in the lower house. This does though represent the Greens first elected member of the Lower House. The Greens are the new left wing alternative and have a range of policies aimed at building the nation.

The Greens have overachieved in this election with next to no media coverage and being cut out of the leaders debates and forums. If they had the opportunity to discuss their visions in the same manner as the ALP and LNP they may well have an even greater presence. Next time I hope they are given the respect and offered the opportunity to impress or fail in line with the ALP and LNP.

Australia now lives in limbo until the final results and negotiations are complete. Nervous yes, however I now trust more in our democracy than previously. Hopefully the message that was sent to both the ALP and LNP will not be lost, and that message is that they need to be more positive, visionary and different!


We all hate Collingwood

Politics | Posted by Dean
Aug 18 2010

Well having watched (endured) the #RootyQ Leaders Forum I am not convinced by either of the two major Australian political parties that they possess the vision or capabilities to drive the big brown land forward. I would though have liked to have seen the Greens involved in the forum. They are likely to possess the balance of power in the parliament and I think the Australian people need the same access to hear their views. They should at least be paid the respect by the media and given the opportunity to present their views and succeed/fail in the same manner that the Australian Labour Party and the Liberal/National Coalition are afforded.

In terms of performance it was a nil all draw with neither side winning the crowd. Prime Minister Julia Gillard though made a fantastic statement in relation to AFL:

We all hate Collingwood.

Well spoken!

Twitter did go off and provided much light relief.


Infrastructure Australia Craves

General, Politics | Posted by Dean
Aug 07 2010

Today I have been sparked into thought about the infrastructure that I believe Australia needs in order to continue progress at each level of the community. After much consideration I see many infrastructure needs being served by removing the reliance upon fossil fuels. By reducing our reliance on fossil fuels there are two effects:
1. Removes our exposure to international price fluctuations of resource, primarily oil.
2. Greatly reduces the carbon footprint of Australia, and thus reduces our contributions to global warming.
These 2 benefits cover the three key areas for Australia’s improvement, economic, ecological, and societal. How is that so?

Economic benefits are seen by removing outside influences on prices. For example, OPEC often decide to limit supply simply to maintain a price that sees the oil price higher than what true market influences would dictate. This is then seen at the pump and every Australians budget shrinks for the period of the inflated prices thanks to a price fixing conglomerate.

The Ecological benefits are clear. Fewer greenhouse gases polluting the atmosphere, and fewer smog clouds to see. This in turn improves air quality for the environment.

Societal benefits come from the economic and ecological benefits. Each Ausstralian will be given some certainty over the cost of fuel for example, and also know that by taking brave decisions our country is doing something for the environment.

There are two key areas where I can see Australia reduce it’s reliance on fossil fuels they are transport and electrical production infrastructure. There are viable alternative solutions to service these needs. They do however come with a need for investment and commitment by our political leaders.

Transportation
Transport is a primary concern for the Australian public. We need to be able to get around efficiently and quickly. Currently the primary transport mode for public and business means is by motor vehicles (cars/trucks/motorcycles). The engines in these vehicles are predominantly fossil fuel burning combustion engines running on oil based petroleum. Whilst some companies have release hybrid passenger vehicles and are working on alternative fuel technologies there is little publicity in what is happening within the freight services that predominantly use diesel fuel.

I believe that Australia should be investing in rail to a far greater degree. Expansion of existing rail links and switches from diesel technology to electrical power needs consideration. Further, existing lines such as the NSW South Coast line on the CityRail network should be improved to ensure dual lines the full length of the journey. Currently there is a vast length that is single line, and thus a broken down train can lead to horrendous delays. Rail when it is fast and efficient is a clearly acceptable alternative to road transport, and potentially with a high speed rail link between regional and city centres an alternative to the vastly more polluting aircraft.

Australia also needs to consider greater investment in developing electric powered cars with the vehicle industry. These vehicles are not that far away, however measures need to be taken so that price barriers do not make them unreachable for the person on the average wage.

Power Generation
Modern society has a reliance on electricity for almost all tasks. Currently Australia relies on old technology burning fossil fuels, predominately coal, to produce electricity. This pumps vast amounts of carbon into the atmosphere and contributes to global warming. Whilst there is a promise of clean coal it is yet to be seen if it is indeed a possibility.

For power generation the nation needs to revisit the nuclear power alternative. The use of nuclear power generation for Australia delivers benefits in relation to the emittance of greenhouse gases and reduction on the reliance on fossil fuels. Nuclear power generation produces no greenhouse gases, however the processes required to set up and operate a plant may.

There are a number of studies (Nuclear Energy Institute) that show that even with these considerations accounted for nuclear power generation is significantly less polluting than tradition energy sources. A prime example is a study undertaken by British Energy 5 years ago. In this study the impacts of real operating plants (nuclear, gas and coal fired) life cycle were assessed. The CO2 emissions from the nuclear plant were 5 g/kWh. Coal came in at 900 g/kWh and gas at 400 g/kWh. As can be seen against traditional methods nuclear is by far superior.

Even when pitched against renewables nuclear power there are studies showing that nuclear power at 17 tons/gWh comes in just behind wind (14 tons/gWh) and geothermals (15 tons/gWh).

Note: g/kWh = grams per killowatt hour, gWh = gigawatt hour


It’s a Bird, It’s a Plane … No it’s the South Coast Train

CityRail FAILS, Politics, Promises, Promises | Posted by Dean
Aug 06 2010

Artist Impression of an Illawarra MagLev

Artist Impression of an Illawarra MagLev

.

It would appear that Labor trots this policy out each election and then condemns it to the too hard basket. In this campaign the party has turned to this policy very recently, perhaps with the emergence of the “Real” Julia. This is evidenced by Greens leader Bob Brown who has said that Labor voted down a Greens High Speed Rail proposal within the last few months and adds:

“Labor’s changed its policy because it’s seen the polling on this which shows a huge majority of Australians – over 70 per cent – want high-speed rail.” – $20m study considers fast train

Personally I believe that the need for Australia to lower it’s reliance on carbon emitting vehicles needs to be a major factor here. Surely there is enough science out there now to put some figures around the cost to the environment of running cars versus a high speed train. This could then be translated to some dollar amount and thus expressed as a cost to the economy. It would have a much truer meaning if K Rudd had managed to set up an emission trading scheme or carbon tax, but thats a moot point now.

Also, I think the study should look at how many commuters are utilising the existing slow links either by car, bus or train. Then calculating a cost to the commuters based on an average wage. I know I lose thousands of dollars worth of my time sitting on the existing network on my 6 hour daily commute. That is a real cost to the community as people sitting on a long journey are not productive citizens. This cost needs to be accounted for.

Through adding these two factors to any study the economics of rail may be swayed and Australia may finally see the beginning of a true phase shift in public transport. I though will continue to live in hope that one day my commute can be slashed.

Note: Oliver Hartwich from the Centre for Independent Studies has also highlighted CityRail’s management efforts with the comment:

“I think what we should do is really take it one step at a time, talk about Sydney-Newcastle, make that connection better, make it more comfortable and make it faster.
It used to be faster in the 1930s. I mean that’s a scandal.” – $20m study considers fast train

I am hopeful that CityRail will not be involved in any manner with a project of this magnitude.


High Speed Rail Link and the Illawarra

CityRail FAILS, Politics, Promises, Promises | Posted by Dean
Aug 06 2010

The local WIN news is talking about the possibility of Australia finally getting a high speed rail link across the East Coast of Australia linking Melbourne, Canberra, Sydney, Gold Coast and Brisbane. I am hopeful that this could happen, though I pray that CityRail are not involved in any manner.

CityRail have a proven track record of under servicing the people of New South Wales generally and the Illawarra specifically. I am concerned that if CityRail are involved in providing/maintaining infrastructure for a rail link of national importance that it would lead to major national disruption.

That said, the idea is a good one. A national high speed rail link will open up regional centres along it to expansion. Further, the idea of being as close to Canberra as Sydney is a good one for me personally. It opens up job opportunities and also would cut my commute in half. I will be looking into the technical aspects of this idea in more detail when I can, but the idea is good.