<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Rude</title>
	<link>http://schwoit.com/2007/02/26/how-rude/</link>
	<description>Gardening and Geekdom in the Urban Jungle</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 15:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ShadowKnight</title>
		<link>http://schwoit.com/2007/02/26/how-rude/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>ShadowKnight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 11:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://schwoit.com/2007/02/26/how-rude/#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Another classic has come in response to a rejection. The text is:
&lt;blockquote&gt;Thank You tells so much about your website.
 
Regards&lt;/blockquote&gt;
The website in question was:
&lt;ol&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;lazily submitted to an incorrect category&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;failed to function correctly&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

Hence rejection. The attempt to shame me to reconsider has had no affect, the site remains well and truly in the garbage pile.
I am though still :)

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another classic has come in response to a rejection. The text is:</p>
<blockquote><p>Thank You tells so much about your website.</p>
<p>Regards</p></blockquote>
<p>The website in question was:</p>
<ol>
<li>lazily submitted to an incorrect category</li>
<li>failed to function correctly</li>
</ol>
<p>Hence rejection. The attempt to shame me to reconsider has had no affect, the site remains well and truly in the garbage pile.<br />
I am though still <img src='http://schwoit.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lord Watchdog</title>
		<link>http://schwoit.com/2007/02/26/how-rude/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Lord Watchdog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 13:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://schwoit.com/2007/02/26/how-rude/#comment-17</guid>
		<description>The above e-mail is clearly unprofessional both in tact, spelling and grammar. As Dan said, it is wise to take the content of e-mail with a grain of salt though at the same time I think people who communicate in English should go to a far better effort.

Internet/Text message jargon like "ur" doesn't belong in business correspondence. The sender also has no idea of how to construct a sentence. The message is broken up with a string of commas rather than into two or three seperate sentences as it should have been.

The sender appears not to understand the word 'instantly' either - placing it alongside a condition that his site be added within 24 hours.

Whether the sender is being rude or not, I actually choose to ignore any e-mail that is poorly written. That isn't to say that I expect others too. It is a mere case that I just don't have the time to interpret the point someone is trying to get across when they communicate in some sort of hybrid language.

That said, the quality of e-mail is still a secondary consideration compared to the amount of spam submissions that directories receive, including the two I own.

Keep smiling. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The above e-mail is clearly unprofessional both in tact, spelling and grammar. As Dan said, it is wise to take the content of e-mail with a grain of salt though at the same time I think people who communicate in English should go to a far better effort.</p>
<p>Internet/Text message jargon like &#8220;ur&#8221; doesn&#8217;t belong in business correspondence. The sender also has no idea of how to construct a sentence. The message is broken up with a string of commas rather than into two or three seperate sentences as it should have been.</p>
<p>The sender appears not to understand the word &#8216;instantly&#8217; either - placing it alongside a condition that his site be added within 24 hours.</p>
<p>Whether the sender is being rude or not, I actually choose to ignore any e-mail that is poorly written. That isn&#8217;t to say that I expect others too. It is a mere case that I just don&#8217;t have the time to interpret the point someone is trying to get across when they communicate in some sort of hybrid language.</p>
<p>That said, the quality of e-mail is still a secondary consideration compared to the amount of spam submissions that directories receive, including the two I own.</p>
<p>Keep smiling. <img src='http://schwoit.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://schwoit.com/2007/02/26/how-rude/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 10:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://schwoit.com/2007/02/26/how-rude/#comment-14</guid>
		<description>I think its a new scam running through the directory industry. I think it will struggle to catch on but it doesn't stop people from trying.

A lot of the emails being sent these days lack the courtesy that many of us might be familiar with. I believe, more than anything, that this is a problem that has developed because of the international nature of this industry. I think that whilst many submitters &#38; directory owners understand the basic English principles, many do not understand the tone of what they write. So even basic emails look like &lt;i&gt;demands&lt;/i&gt; rather than &lt;i&gt;requests&lt;/i&gt;. 

I think we have to develop thicker skins and greater tolerance levels and try not to be offended by what, on the face of it, looks like a rude demand, because it really might just be an honest request from someone who doesn't know how to describe it any better.

That's my thoughts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think its a new scam running through the directory industry. I think it will struggle to catch on but it doesn&#8217;t stop people from trying.</p>
<p>A lot of the emails being sent these days lack the courtesy that many of us might be familiar with. I believe, more than anything, that this is a problem that has developed because of the international nature of this industry. I think that whilst many submitters &amp; directory owners understand the basic English principles, many do not understand the tone of what they write. So even basic emails look like <i>demands</i> rather than <i>requests</i>. </p>
<p>I think we have to develop thicker skins and greater tolerance levels and try not to be offended by what, on the face of it, looks like a rude demand, because it really might just be an honest request from someone who doesn&#8217;t know how to describe it any better.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s my thoughts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
